
The Gallery Trap: Why Artists and Collectors Are Paying the Price
0 commentsđ¨ The Gallery Trap: Why Artists and Collectors Are Paying the Price
Welcome to the art world - where creativity thrives but profits often disappear into thin air. Or, more precisely, into the pockets of high-end galleries. At ArtReThought, we believe it's time to rethink the system. What was once a model built to support artists has evolved into a structure that often works against them and the collectors who support them.
đ¸ 50% Commission â Still the Norm?
Letâs get real about the numbers. Most traditional galleries charge artists 50% to 60% commission on every sale. That means when an artwork sells for âŹ10,000, the artist often walks away with âŹ5,000 - âŹ6,000. The rest? It goes to the gallery and thatâs before you factor in additional costs like marketing, shipping, framing and materials, all of which are usually paid by the artist. For many, that leaves barely enough to cover rent, let alone fund the next piece.
You might think this trade-off is worth it â that galleries provide exposure, prestige and network access in exchange. And sometimes, they do. But letâs not ignore the reality: the majority of emerging and mid-career artists never make it to the "blue-chip" tier and many find themselves trapped in cycles of inconsistency, dependency and debt. According to the Creative Independentâs artist income study, over 60% of visual artists earn less than âŹ20,000 a year from their work. So if galleries are taking half, what are artists supposed to live on?
đ§Š The Broken Resale Game
Now letâs flip the script to the other side of the market â the collectors. For many, buying art isnât just a passion, it's also an investment. But hereâs the uncomfortable truth: only 8% of artworks enter the secondary market and most artworks donât hold their value, let alone appreciate. According to ArtTacticâs 2023 secondary market analysis, nearly 70% of artworks by non-established artists resell at a loss. Not because the art lacks merit, but because it was overpriced from the start - pumped up to accommodate the galleryâs margin.
Berlin-based collector Sarah M. shared her story with us: âI bought a piece for âŹ8,000 from a well-known Berlin gallery. Two years later, I tried to resell it privately - couldnât get more than âŹ4,500. When I asked the gallery to help, they said they âdonât do resalesâ. I felt duped.â Unfortunately, her story isnât unique. The moment a work leaves the gallery, it often loses the very context and branding that justified its price. It becomes just a canvas, a signature and a difficult question: Whatâs this really worth now?
đźď¸ Gallerists as Gatekeepers
Galleries have long been the cultural gatekeepers of the art world. They decide who gets shown, who gets sold and who gets remembered. That influence can be powerful - but it can also be problematic. Too often, decisions are driven less by quality and innovation and more by reputation, relationship and perceived market value.
One artist we work with, had the first major gallery show in 2021. âThe gallery sold my work for âŹ12,000. I got âŹ6,000. I was thrilled - until I realized they were pushing prices faster than the market could handle. Two years later, none of the buyers could resell the work. One piece went to auction for âŹ4,500. I felt like my own market was being used against me.â
This is where things get messy. If resale values plummet, artists' reputations can suffer. Collectors lose trust. And galleries, instead of stepping in to support the ecosystem, often distance themselves entirely, because there's no financial incentive to get involved in secondary sales unless theyâre reselling blue-chip works. Itâs a system that rewards short-term gains and punishes long-term growth.
đ Time for a Shift: Rethinking Art Economics
The art world isnât broken because of one bad player, itâs broken because the system hasn't adapted to the times. In an era where creators can connect directly with collectors, why are we still relying on outdated gatekeeping structures? Why do we accept 50% fees as normal? Why do we pretend resale doesnât matter, when it affects everyone?
At ArtReThought, weâre building something different. A platform where artists retain more of their value, collectors gain clarity and resale isnât a taboo subject - itâs part of the conversation. We're reimagining how pricing (20 to 30 %), provenance and long-term value can work together in a fairer, more transparent model.
Weâre not saying galleries donât have a role. Many do great work and there will always be space for physical experiences and curation. But itâs time to challenge the dominance of a model that benefits a few and disempowers the many. Because when artists earn more, collectors invest smarter and the market is honest, everyone wins.
⨠Final Thought
We love art. Thatâs why weâre fighting for a system that actually works for the people who create it and the people who believe in it. The old model had its moment, but art deserves better than business as usual.
đ Ready to rethink art with us?
Follow, share and join a new kind of conversation. One where art is valued differently and more fairly.
Comments